Diversity Without The Numbers: Gannett Will Stop Publishing DEI Statistics
In a bold move that has sparked both curiosity and controversy, Gannett recently announced its decision to cease publishing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) statistics. This decision marks a significant departure from the current trend among companies striving for transparency and accountability in their diversity efforts. While some may view this as a step backward, Gannett asserts that it will not waver in its commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace.
The decision to stop publishing DEI statistics may seem counterintuitive, especially at a time when more and more companies are making their diversity data publicly available. Transparency in this area has become a key measure of a company’s dedication to promoting diversity and inclusion. So why would Gannett choose to buck this trend?
According to Gannett, the decision reflects a shift in focus from numbers to action. The company believes that true progress in diversity and inclusion can only be achieved through meaningful initiatives and tangible outcomes, rather than just numbers on a page. By shifting the focus away from statistics, Gannett aims to direct attention towards the actual impact of its diversity efforts.
While some may argue that transparency is essential for accountability, Gannett’s approach highlights an important distinction. Merely reporting diversity numbers does not guarantee meaningful change. In fact, some companies have been criticized for prioritizing optics over actual progress in diversity and inclusion. By emphasizing action over statistics, Gannett is signaling a commitment to real, substantive change within its organization.
It’s worth noting that Gannett’s decision does not mean an end to its diversity initiatives. On the contrary, the company has made it clear that it will continue with its business model, which includes a strong focus on diversity and inclusion. By shifting the focus from numbers to action, Gannett is positioning itself to drive meaningful change within its organization and beyond.
This move by Gannett raises important questions about the role of DEI statistics in driving diversity and inclusion efforts. While transparency is undoubtedly important, it is equally crucial to ensure that efforts in this area translate into real change. Gannett’s decision challenges conventional wisdom and prompts us to rethink how we measure progress in diversity and inclusion.
As companies grapple with the complexities of diversity and inclusion, Gannett’s approach offers a fresh perspective on how to drive meaningful change. By prioritizing action over statistics, the company is setting a new standard for accountability in this crucial area. Only time will tell whether this approach proves successful, but one thing is clear: Gannett is not shying away from the challenge of fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace.
#Diversity, #Inclusion, #Gannett, #DEI, #BusinessModel